Suspected internal fraud review
Review transaction patterns, account activity, and payment histories where internal fraud is suspected.
For business owners, finance teams & commercial counsel
Financial record review for businesses
FinancialProofReview helps business owners, finance teams, and commercial counsel organize transaction histories, vendor and billing records, suspected fraud losses, partnership disputes, and financial-document irregularities into clearer forensic accounting review workpapers.
Built by HopkinsForensic. Powered by StatementProof workpapers.
When this is useful
Matters where the business record needs clarity
Typical situations include suspected internal fraud, vendor or billing irregularities, partnership and shareholder disputes, financial records that need to be organized before audit, litigation, or settlement, transaction patterns that need investigation, and matters where the financial records have to be reviewed before management or commercial strategy can be decided.
Business review categories
Financial-record review categories for business matters
FinancialProofReview is built for matters where the business records are incomplete, inconsistent, or too messy to evaluate from summaries alone. The review path starts with the records available and turns them into organized questions, workpapers, and follow-up items for owners, finance, and counsel.
Vendor and payment irregularities
Review vendor payments, billing patterns, and disbursement records for unexplained or unsupported activity.
Partnership and shareholder disputes
Organize partnership distributions, capital accounts, and transaction histories for partnership or shareholder review.
Source deposit tracing
Separate explained business deposits from unsupported credits requiring follow-up.
Transfer flow analysis
Trace movement between business accounts, owners, or related entities.
Missing bank records
Identify statement gaps and missing production before deeper review begins.
Billing and reimbursement review
Review billing records, reimbursement patterns, and expense submissions for irregularities.
Pre-litigation financial-document review
Organize records into reviewable workpapers before commercial litigation, settlement, or expert engagement.
Deliverables
What the review can produce
Each engagement is organized into reviewer-grade workpapers rather than narrative memos. Typical outputs include:
- Source document index
- Transaction inventory
- Account-relationship map
- Vendor and payment summaries
- Transfer-flow summary
- Loss summaries where supported by records
- Workpaper-style findings
- Follow-up questions for owners, finance, or counsel
How this supports business work
Review support, not management or legal advice
FinancialProofReview supports business owners, finance teams, and counsel by organizing financial records into reviewable workpapers and issue lists. Businesses and counsel remain responsible for management decisions, audit responses, litigation strategy, and commercial outcomes. The review is financial-record support, not legal or management advice.
Methodology
Led by a Certified Fraud Examiner
FinancialProofReview engagements are led by a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) with subject-matter expertise in forensic accounting, fraud examination, and financial-record review. The work is conducted from a fraud-examination and forensic accounting review perspective and is organized into reviewer-grade workpapers rather than unsupported narrative conclusions.
The methodology is operated by HopkinsForensic, an independent forensic-accounting firm, using the StatementProof workpaper system.
Next step
Start with the records you have
If the financial records are incomplete, disorganized, or unclear, the first step is identifying what exists, what is missing, and what questions the records raise.
Important boundaries
FinancialProofReview and HopkinsForensic provide forensic accounting and financial-record review support. They are not a law firm, audit firm, or management advisor. They do not provide legal advice, audit opinions, or management decisions. Business and counsel users remain responsible for management, audit, and litigation outcomes.
No review outcome is guaranteed. The usefulness of any review depends on the records available.