Missing bank records
Identify statement gaps, missing production periods, incomplete account coverage, and records that need to be requested before a financial review can be trusted.
For investigative & administrative reviewers
Investigative financial-record review
FinancialProofReview provides investigative financial-record review support for agencies, inspectors general, auditors, counsel, restitution reviewers, and public-sector or legal-support teams who need clearer financial-record summaries, transaction timelines, source-of-funds review, and issue spotting before next-step decisions.
Built by HopkinsForensic. Powered by StatementProof workpapers.
Primary audiences
Who uses an investigative financial-record review
Investigative financial-record review supports teams that need the underlying records organized before next-step decisions are made. Typical reviewers include:
- Investigators and investigative teams
- Agencies and inspectors general
- Auditors and internal-review teams
- Counsel supporting investigative or administrative matters
- Restitution reviewers and loss-summary reviewers
- Elder financial exploitation reviewers
- Fraud-loss and victim-loss reviewers
- Public-sector and legal-support teams
Review categories
Core topics for investigative and administrative review
FinancialProofReview is built for matters where the financial records are incomplete, inconsistent, or too messy to evaluate from bank statements alone. The review path starts with the records available and produces organized questions, workpapers, and follow-up items.
Source deposit tracing
Separate visible source clues from unidentified deposits so reviewers can see which credits are explained, which remain unsupported, and which need follow-up.
Transfer flow analysis
Trace apparent movement between accounts, identify matched transfers, and distinguish internal account movement from outside-account activity.
Fraud-loss summaries
Organize transaction-level activity behind fraud-loss summaries so reviewers can see what the records support, what remains unexplained, and what needs additional documentation.
Restitution support
Organize transaction-level support behind restitution figures so reviewers can review which entries are documented, which are uncertain, and which need follow-up.
Elder financial exploitation record review
Review bank, brokerage, and account records for unexplained withdrawals, unusual transfers, third-party additions, and transaction patterns relevant to elder financial exploitation matters.
Learn more about elder financial exploitation record review →
Vendor and payment irregularities
Review vendor payments, invoice patterns, duplicate disbursements, unusual recipients, and transaction sequences that warrant follow-up.
Healthcare and insurance billing irregularities
Organize healthcare-billing, insurance-billing, and related financial records for matters where billing patterns, payments, or coverage activity need review.
Public-sector financial-record review support
Financial-record review support for public-sector teams reviewing program funds, restricted accounts, grant activity, or other financial records that need organized review before next-step decisions.
Deliverables
What the review can produce
Each engagement is organized into reviewer-grade workpapers rather than narrative memos. Typical outputs include:
- Source document index
- Account and statement inventory
- Missing-record list
- Transaction summaries and timelines
- Deposit and source-issue list
- Transfer-flow summary
- Reconciliation notes
- Workpaper-style findings
- Follow-up questions for the reviewing team or records custodian
Role of the review
How it supports investigative and administrative teams
FinancialProofReview supports reviewers by organizing financial records into reviewable workpapers and issue lists. The work is financial-record review support — not legal advice, agency determinations, or charging decisions.
The reviewing team remains responsible for investigative direction, administrative determinations, charging decisions, agency findings, and any downstream actions. The review is intended to give the team a clearer view of what the records show, what is missing, and what needs follow-up.
Methodology
Led by a Certified Fraud Examiner
FinancialProofReview engagements are led by a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) with subject-matter expertise in forensic accounting, fraud examination, and financial-record review. The work is conducted from a fraud-examination and forensic accounting review perspective and is organized into reviewer-grade workpapers rather than unsupported narrative conclusions.
The methodology is operated by HopkinsForensic, an independent forensic-accounting firm, using the StatementProof workpaper system.
Next step
Start with the records you have
If the records are incomplete, disorganized, or unclear, the first step is identifying what exists, what is missing, and what needs follow-up.
Important boundaries
FinancialProofReview and HopkinsForensic provide forensic accounting and financial-record review support. They are not a law firm, law-enforcement agency, investigative agency, or government entity. They do not provide legal advice, law-enforcement authority, charging decisions, agency determinations, testimony services, custody services, or guaranteed outcomes.
No review outcome is guaranteed. The scope and usefulness of any review depends on the records available.